Best vacuum cleaner with dust container - Dyson, Tefal or Philips?

Design does not affect the performance of the equipment, but when buying it is the first thing we pay attention to. Of the five compared models, the eye immediately stops at the Dyson. Futuristic design, color contrasts - it's hard to pass by such a bright and stylish vacuum cleaner. The Miele vacuum cleaner looks nice - as expensive as it costs. The buyer understands at a glance that this is a premium-class technique. The design of the Philips vacuum cleaner is well developed. Unusual shape, harmonious combination of colors. It immediately seems not only pleasant in appearance, but also comfortable. But we will confirm or deny this by comparing the characteristics. Tefal distinguished itself by pleasant smooth shapes and outwardly convenient design. LG looks simpler compared to other participants in the comparison, but also quite original, vaguely reminiscent of a motorcycle helmet.

All vacuum cleaners from the comparison are equipped with a set of nozzles for cleaning the whole house. But only two models are equipped with turbo brushes - these are LG and Tefal.When comparing these two models, Tefal still comes out on top because of the more extensive configuration: nozzles for parquet, upholstered furniture, carpets. The turbo brush can be purchased separately for the Dyson vacuum cleaner. It will cost another 5000-6000 rubles. But the complete universal nozzle copes well with cleaning various floor coverings, so a turbo brush is not even necessary here.

Miele has a fairly standard set of nozzles, but the model deserves an additional plus for the good quality of the plastic. Philips has the most modest equipment: a built-in standard nozzle, small and slotted.

The quality of cleaning is affected by several parameters - suction power, dust container volume, filtration system. The models under consideration have many of the same characteristics. All of them are equipped with HEPA fine filters and dust containers, designed for dry cleaning. Suction power varies, but it is not indicated in all models.More often, manufacturers prescribe only the rated or power consumption, using this data as a marketing ploy. Moreover, the power consumption affects only the power consumption, and not the suction power. Of the five comparison models, suction power is indicated only for two vacuum cleaners - for Dyson it is a maximum of 184 W, for LG 420 W. Even taking into account the fact that not all vacuum cleaners have data, we can no longer put Dyson in first place in terms of cleaning quality, despite the popularity of the brand.

How well the vacuum cleaner copes with garbage, dust, animal hair is best shown by user reviews. Most often they write about the power of a Philips vacuum cleaner. At the same time, it has the largest dust container. The power is adjustable, at maximum it even lifts the carpet from the floor, but it pulls all the dust out of it. Miele is very praised for the capacity of the dust collector, power. It collects dust even where it is not visible. Users speak well of the quality of cleaning with a Tefal brand vacuum cleaner. It is also powerful, equipped with a turbo brush, copes well with fine dust, keeping it in the container. Dyson, despite the small suction power of 184W, copes with cleaning by four plus. It collects dust and small debris completely, but it is advisable to buy an additional turbo brush to clean carpets from animal hair.LG is powerful even in terms of characteristics, 420 W for a vacuum cleaner is a very good indicator.

One of the most convenient models for the home is offered by the Philips brand. She has two advantages: a small weight of 6.2 kg and a long eight-meter wire. The model is compact, maneuverable, easy to handle and does not need much storage space. The power control is right on the handle, which is also very convenient. But in terms of volume level in comparison, it is the noisiest - up to 77 dB. In terms of ease of use, the Dyson vacuum cleaner shows itself perfectly. It is slightly heavier - it weighs 8 kg, the cord is shorter - 6.7 meters. But it does not require the purchase of consumables, the dust from the container is shaken out by pressing one button, the care is elementary. The vacuum cleaner itself is maneuverable, the nozzles are movable, they easily get to hard-to-reach places. Tefal is good in two ways: the lowest noise level of 68 dB and the longest cord of 8.4 meters. There is no need to switch the vacuum cleaner to another outlet when cleaning a large room. According to user reviews, it works really quietly - you do not need to raise your voice when talking, it is almost inaudible behind a closed door. The dust container can be easily removed and simply rinsed under running water. There is only one drawback - the vacuum cleaner weighs almost 10 kg, it is difficult for women to manage it.

If you need something more compact, more maneuverable, you can look at the model from LG. The vacuum cleaner weighs only 6 kilograms, the power is switched on the handle, the attachments are easy to put on and take off, the collected dust is easily shaken out of the container and does not scatter around. But for some buyers, for complete convenience, the length of the cord is not enough. In the case of Miele, users often write about quality, reliability, but sometimes they mention good maneuverability and ease of cleaning. The power adjustment is located on the body, it is not very convenient, you have to bend over during the cleaning process.

Only modern functional vacuum cleaners with a container instead of a dust bag are included in the comparison. But each model has its own features that make cleaning more convenient or better. For example, Philips has four useful options at once. Illumination of the cleaning area makes dust on the floor, under beds and cabinets more visible, and helps to control the quality of cleaning. If the vacuum cleaner runs idle for a while, it will automatically turn off. Although the need for this feature is debatable, since situations where the vacuum cleaner is left on unattended are very rare. But the filter contamination sensor and power control on the handle are quite necessary and useful options.Dyson distinguished itself by a design feature - when it rolls over, it returns to its original position. One-button cleaning is convenient, but it is also found in other vacuum cleaners.

An interesting feature was added to the LG brand vacuum cleaner. The pressing system knocks the dust into compact briquettes. This solution has two advantages - the capacity of the container increases, when it is cleaned, the dust does not scatter to the sides, but falls out in neat lumps. Miele is convenient with the parking system, the handle with the nozzle can simply be placed in the middle of the room, without laying it on the floor, without leaning against the wall. Another interesting feature is the automatic cleaning of the fine dust filter. This feature ensures high suction power throughout the entire cleaning time. But Tefal did not distinguish itself with anything special, except for indicating the fullness of the dust collector.

All vacuum cleaners from the comparison are similar in functionality, but differ greatly in cost.Mainly because of two brands - the hyped Dyson and the premium Miele. There are two budget options: Tefal and LG. They differ slightly in price, both models cost about 18,000 rubles. The rest of the vacuum cleaners can hardly be called budget. The price of a Philips vacuum cleaner is about 28,000 rubles, but according to the totality of all the criteria, it really costs this money. This is the best solution in terms of price-quality ratio in comparison.

The Miele premium vacuum cleaner, with characteristics similar to other models, costs almost 33,000 rubles. Dyson is even more expensive - about 40,000 rubles, and the price here goes more for the brand. Yes, the vacuum cleaner is of high quality, convenient, but you can also find more budget models of not the worst functionality and quality.

This criterion is based on two parameters - the number of queries in the Yandex search engine over the past month and the average user rating according to several sources. The Dyson vacuum cleaner was the most popular. Potential buyers are interested in it most often, but the rating turned out to be the lowest. Some users expected more from an expensive vacuum cleaner. Buyers are often interested in the model from LG and give it the highest rating - 4.80 on a five-point scale.

In third place in terms of popularity and user rating is Miele with its expensive but high-quality vacuum cleaner. If the financial situation allows you to buy premium equipment, then it can be considered as one of the highest quality and best models. Compared vacuum cleaners from Philips and Tefal are not the most popular, but Philips gets a pretty high score from users.

As a result of the comparison, two vacuum cleaners, Dyson and Philips, scored equally high. Both models receive a score of 4.84 points. Philips comes out on top for two reasons. First - he won in three categories, and Dyson in two. The second is that his victories are more significant. This is the quality of cleaning, ease of use and functionality. Everything that buyers expect from a good vacuum cleaner. Dyson was in second place as the most stylish and popular.

With a rating of 4.78, the model from LG took the third place. She became the winner in terms of cost. This is the most budgetary, but far from the worst vacuum cleaner in comparison. Slightly, one tenth of a point behind the rating is the model from Tefal - a vacuum cleaner with good cleaning quality, generous equipment and an affordable price.On the last line was Miele. It is high-quality and reliable, it belongs to premium equipment, but it costs much more than vacuum cleaners with similar functionality and cleaning quality.