1. Samsung Galaxy A52 4G and Apple iPhone SE 2020
Relatively inexpensive smartphones by the standards of these two companies, for which they ask for around 30-40 thousand rubles.Do you recall with nostalgia the design of devices of yesteryear? You do not like the fact that all Android devices have become equipped with a frameless display? In this case, you might consider buying an iPhone SE. This is a good old "apple" smartphone, which has a very wide screen bezel, where even the Home button fits. Of course, with a fingerprint scanner, which more expensive models lack. At the same time, the device was released in 2020, in connection with which it received modern hardware.
The competitor of this iPhone is the Galaxy A52, and it is very different. Not only with its price tag, which is more adequate, but also with its appearance. The screen here occupies almost the entire area of the front panel. The display does not even have a drop-shaped notch - the front camera belongs to the so-called island type. As a result, the screen diagonal turned out to be much larger, which will appeal to fans of watching movies and entertaining videos. The resolution is also higher. And the display of the Samsung smartphone is able to boast an increased refresh rate of up to 90 Hz. And you quickly get used to it.
Like it or not, but iOS is much better optimized for weak hardware. However, is it possible to seriously call the Apple A13 that word? Yes, chip consists of only six cores. But on the other hand, its clock frequency can reach 2.65 GHz.Not bad for such a little one! Unsurprisingly, stuttering on the iPhone SE is much less common than on the Galaxy A52. Even though the device received a smaller volume random access memory. Difficulties can only be built-in storage. The user is given only 64 GB, while the owner of the South Korean device will receive at least 128 GB. And the iPhone doesn't have a microSD card slot. Therefore, it is better not to save money - consider buying a version with more memory (but it will cost even more).
Both smartphones have stereo speakers. If you want to output sound to the headset, then in the case of the iPhone, it is better to use the wireless method for this. As for the Galaxy A52, it is endowed with the familiar 3.5mm audio jack. At the same time, the manufacturer managed to implement full-fledged moisture protection. Just like Apple does.
If speak about cells, then here is the advantage of Samsung. The company from Cupertino endowed its creation with an outdated 12-megapixel module. The South Koreans have placed four cameras on the back of their smartphone. The main one has a 64-megapixel resolution and a fairly good viewing angle. If it is not enough, you can use the ultra-wide-angle camera. And for shooting flowers and insects, a 5-megapixel macro camera is used. The fourth module allows the device to blur the background, which is useful in portrait photography.
It should be noted that both smartphones are endowed with optical image stabilization. But it cannot be said that it perfectly copes with its task - the manufacturers have left the groundwork for full-fledged flagships. The cameras also surprise with the ability to shoot 4K video, albeit only at 30 frames / s.As for the front camera, Samsung again gives the best result.
Both smartphones received a large number wireless modules. For example, devices can be used for contactless payment for purchases. The iPhone SE has a slight advantage only because of the support for the more modern Wi-Fi standard. However, how many of our readers have a router at home that is capable of distributing such a network?
Most of all, the devices differ in their size and weight. The 148-gram iPhone seems like a feather. But Apple managed to achieve this parameter only through the use of battery capacity 1821 mAh. Not surprisingly, for some buyers, the battery runs out before the end of the working day. It is proposed to charge the device using an 18-watt AC adapter (but a less powerful accessory is included in the kit). At least some pleasant emotions are only supported by wireless charging - the South Korean competitor does not have it.
Index | Samsung Galaxy A52 4G | iPhone SE 2020 |
Specifications | ||
Display | AMOLED, 6.5 inches, 2400x1080 pixels | IPS, 4.7 inches, 1334x750 pixels |
CPU | Snapdragon 720G | Apple A13 |
Memory (RAM + ROM) | 4 GB + 128 GB | 3 GB + 64 GB |
rear camera | 4 modules, 64 MP + 12 MP + 5 MP + 5 MP | 1 module, 12 MP |
Price | RUB 28,990 | RUB 38,990 |
Moisture protection | IP67 | IP67 |
Criteria scores | ||
User opinion | 4.55 | 4.45 |
average price | 4.50 | 4.30 |
Ease of use | 4.40 | 4.45 |
cameras | 4.50 | 4.20 |
Display | 4.65 | 4.20 |
Sound | 4.55 | 4.50 |
autonomy | 4.60 | 4.20 |
Average score | 4.53 | 4.32 |
So, Galaxy A52 vs iPhone SE, who comes out the winner? There are no options here. The "apple" product will suit only those who, for some reason, do not like frameless design. Or those who are already accustomed to iOS, but do not yet have money for a device with more advanced characteristics.Buying this device will limit you in many ways. It uses a low-capacity battery, and only one rear camera, and the amount of memory will be, with a high degree of probability, small. And for watching videos, this device is the least suitable.
Samsung Galaxy A52 4G
Best value for money
2. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and Apple iPhone Xr
Excellent smartphones, for which they ask for about 45 thousand rubles.Now the iPhone Xr is one of the most inexpensive "apple" smartphones with a frameless design. Diagonal it display brought to 6.1 inches, which is already quite acceptable for comfortable video viewing. The only pity is that the resolution let us down. And IPS technology is not what you expect to get for that kind of money. In this regard, the Galaxy S20 FE is head and shoulders above its competitor. The South Korean provides both a more energy-efficient AMOLED screen and a higher refresh rate (120 Hz). And when watching movies, support for HDR10 + is useful. Also, this display does not have such a large cutout in its upper part.
As you may have guessed, the Samsung smartphone is a simplified version of the 2020 flagship. In this regard, he received a very powerful eight-core CPU Exynos 990. Its clock speed reaches 2.73 GHz. Yes, and the amount of RAM here is serious. As a result, all sorts of slowdowns become a very rare occurrence. The "apple" product with its six-core Apple A12 Bionic performs a little worse, especially in games. And he confuses 64-gigabyte built-in storage, which fills up very quickly with active use of the camera. Luckily, larger versions exist. They cost even more horse money.
cameras, by the way, the two smartphones are strikingly different. The Cupertino company saved a lot by installing a single module. The physical size of its matrix is only 1/2.55 inches. Now even budget action cameras are equipped with a larger sensor. For a South Korean competitor, this parameter is 1 / 1.76 inches. The resolution, by the way, turned out to be the same (12 megapixels). But Samsung also has additional modules. They allow you to shoot wide-angle and take advantage of a three-fold optical zoom. As for video shooting, both devices carry it out in 4K resolution at 60 frames / s. Of course, optical stabilization is not forgotten.
Pro front camera long story does not make any sense. Here is the victory of the South Korean device. Suffice it to say that it is capable of writing 4K video.
It should be noted that the Samsung product was born a little later. Therefore, it should not be surprising that he received support for Wi-Fi 802.11ax, while the iPhone Xr did not. Also, Apple has traditionally not been generous with support for the aptX digital codec, and therefore high-quality wireless headphones will play much better when paired with the Galaxy S20 FE. As for NFC, it is available in both devices. As in both of them there is no 3.5 mm audio jack.
A Samsung smartphone may not suit someone due to the fact that it frame partly made of plastic. The Apple product in this regard has the best materials - metal and glass. And it provides more color variety. But on the other hand, the Galaxy S20 FE has a much more capacious battery. Yes, and fast charging with the included network adapter is also a nice bonus. Not to mention the ability to charge other devices with your smartphone by placing them on the back panel.Another important feature of the South Korean gadget is moisture protection according to the IP68 standard. This means that the device can withstand even long underwater dives.
Index | Samsung Galaxy S20 | iPhone Xr |
Specifications | ||
Display | AMOLED, 6.5 inches, 2400x1080 pixels | IPS, 6.1 inches, 1792x828 pixels |
CPU | Exynos 990 | Apple A12 Bionic |
Memory (RAM + ROM) | 6 GB + 128 GB | 3 GB + 64 GB |
rear camera | 3 modules, 12 MP + 12 MP + 8 MP | 1 module, 12 MP |
Price | RUB 42,990 | RUB 47,999 |
Moisture protection | IP68 | IP67 |
Criteria scores | ||
User opinion | 4.70 | 4.55 |
average price | 4.20 | 4.10 |
Ease of use | 4.70 | 4.50 |
cameras | 4.60 | 4.40 |
Display | 4.65 | 4.45 |
Sound | 4.55 | 4.50 |
autonomy | 4.75 | 4.45 |
Average score | 4.59 | 4.42 |
In this pair, the winner is predetermined. Alas, the iPhone Xr has absolutely no advantage. The South Korean smartphone surpasses it in everything. It has a better display, a better camera, more memory, a more powerful processor… In a word, you can list for a very long time.
iPhone Xr
Dual SIM
3. Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus and Apple iPhone 11
Full-fledged flagships, released about a year and a half ago, but still relevant.When creating these devices, both companies tried not to overdo it. As a result, the devices turned out to be large, but their weight does not reach even 200 g. For this, the Apple manufacturer traditionally abandoned the capacious battery. The South Koreans did not save on it. Curiously, the Samsung battery is capable of wireless reverse charging. Yes, many do not use this opportunity. But its very presence is nice.
Most of the front panel of both devices is occupied by LCD display. At the same time, Samsung has a noticeably narrower bezel. It should also be noted that the company from Cupertino built an IPS screen. The South Koreans have opted for AMOLED technology, which means deeper blacks are waiting for you. Yes, and a dark theme in the case of such a display makes sense. And the buyer will be pleased with the refresh rate, reaching 120 Hz. Another important advantage is the high resolution.
This pair of smartphones works with different processors. Both the clock frequency and the number of cores differ. But the output is about the same result. This is confirmed even by benchmarks. In a word, you will not notice much difference either in applications or in games. Another thing is volume. memory. Samsung provides more. And it has a microSD card slot. It is important.
South Korean flagships have become popular, including due to superbly implemented cameras. In this case, the Galaxy S20 Plus wins the comparison. The device from Samsung received four modules. As a result, the user has a wide choice. For example, it can use 2x optical zoom at any time. Or switch to ultra-wide-angle shooting. Or use a 12-megapixel main module that works with a 1/1.76-inch matrix. As for the iPhone 11, it has a much more modest dual module. However, the result of shooting in good light around will also please.
This couple is a rare case when opportunities front cameras turn out to be almost identical. It is possible that the iPhone 11 module will give even a slightly better result. However, it will be noticeable only in direct comparison.
In terms of wireless modules devices have almost parity. Both devices support Wi-Fi 6. They also use the fifth version of the “blue tooth”. The Galaxy S20 Plus differs only in its understanding of the aptX digital codec. And someone will like the USB Type-C connector more than Lightning, due to its versatility. As for the 3.5mm audio jack, neither gadget has it.
Index | Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus | iPhone 11 |
Specifications | ||
Display | AMOLED, 6.7 inches, 3200x1440 pixels | IPS, 6.1 inches, 1792x828 pixels |
CPU | Exynos 990 | Apple A13 |
Memory (RAM + ROM) | 8 GB + 128 GB | 4 GB + 64 GB |
rear camera | 4 modules, 12 MP + 12 MP + 64 MP + 0.3 MP | 2 modules, 12 MP + 12 MP |
Price | 45 990 rub. | RUB 54,990 |
Moisture protection | IP68 | IP68 |
Criteria scores | ||
User opinion | 4.60 | 4.50 |
average price | 4.30 | 4.10 |
Ease of use | 4.65 | 4.50 |
cameras | 4.60 | 4.45 |
Display | 4.80 | 4.50 |
Sound | 4.65 | 4.60 |
autonomy | 4.55 | 4.30 |
Average score | 4.59 | 4.42 |
It remains to be added that both smartphones can withstand underwater diving. Their body is made of metal and glass, in this regard, there is no need to worry. In a word, these are real flagships, albeit not released in 2021. Who is declared the winner in this pair of "Samsung vs iPhone"? Again a device from a South Korean company. It is difficult to argue with the fact that he will be more pleased with his display. Yes, and its cameras will offer much more options. But it should be recognized that in this pair, the "apple" product is not too far behind.
iPhone 11
Great color variety
4. Samsung Galaxy S21 Plus and Apple iPhone 11 Pro
The next flagships, which are even more expensive.Surprisingly high resolution display possesses only the iPhone 11 Pro, for which they ask for a very impressive amount. As you have already noticed, cheaper "apple" devices have a problem in this regard. Also, this model is able to boast that its screen is made using OLED technology. If it also had a higher refresh rate, then the South Korean competitor would not have any special advantages. But 60 Hz make themselves felt. Especially if you have already used a smartphone with a higher “hertz” display before.
CPU Both devices traditionally use a different one. But this is again the case when the difference in the number of cores and clock speed is almost imperceptible even with a direct comparison. If the iPhone loses, then it is not felt at all. The result is not affected even by a different volume random access memory, because iOS is slightly better optimized in this regard. Only confuses built-in storage - the leaders of the South Korean company did not even think of offering customers a 64-gigabyte version. By the way, there is no microSD card slot in both devices. It is sad.
Many people buy iPhone 11 Pro for cameras. It makes sense. Yes, in this regard, the victory is again for Samsung, if only because of the ability to write video in 8K resolution. But it should be recognized that the functionality of both devices turned out to be approximately the same. And even in the dark, smartphone cameras give a similar result, despite the more modest size of the matrix in the iPhone. And someone "apple" product will please even more, because it provides a greater optical zoom.
Pro front camera there is no point in ranting for any length of time.They are very similar, the difference in resolution is only a couple of megapixels. And both front cameras can record video in 4K resolution at 60 frames / s.
If you are reading our article from the very beginning, you have already guessed that in terms of wireless modules the two devices have almost parity. The only difference is that Samsung can transmit sound over the air using the aptX HD digital codec.
Apple traditionally saves on accumulator. Its capacity in the case of the iPhone is 3046 mAh. I am glad that at least its charging does not last long. But it would be better if the American firm opted for the 4800 mAh battery built into the Galaxy S21 Plus.
Index | Samsung Galaxy S21 Plus | iPhone 11 Pro |
Specifications | ||
Display | AMOLED, 6.7 inches, 2400x1080 pixels | OLED, 5.8 inches, 2436x1125 pixels |
CPU | Exynos 2100 | Apple A13 |
Memory (RAM + ROM) | 8 GB + 128 GB | 4 GB + 64 GB |
rear camera | 3 modules, 12 MP + 12 MP + 64 MP | 3 modules, 12 MP + 12 MP + 12 MP |
Price | RUB 72,990 | RUB 62,990 |
Moisture protection | IP68 | IP68 |
Criteria scores | ||
User opinion | 4.60 | 4.65 |
average price | 3.80 | 4.00 |
Ease of use | 4.80 | 4.65 |
cameras | 4.65 | 4.70 |
Display | 4.80 | 4.70 |
Sound | 4.80 | 4.80 |
autonomy | 4.75 | 4.60 |
Average score | 4.60 | 4.58 |
Choosing a winner in this pair is the most difficult. This iPhone has at its disposal a modern display. In terms of speed, it is also not inferior to its competitor. And the cameras can't help but rejoice. If the device had a more capacious battery, then we would safely recommend it for purchase!
Samsung Galaxy S21 Plus
Great display
5. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra and Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Top smartphones with an astronomical price tag released in 2021.Choosing a competitor for the iPhone 13 Pro Max is very difficult. It can be a "clamshell" Flip3, which will easily distinguish you among the owners of ordinary smartphones. Or the Note 20 that comes with the smart stylus. But we took an easier path, opposing the iPhone Galaxy S21 Ultra, which is also usually bought for the sake of a chic cameras.
Well, let's immediately evaluate how the selected smartphones shoot. At first glance, the result of photographing seems to be the same. But if you look at the pictures on some huge 4K TV, you can see the advantage of Samsung. No wonder, because they use a 108-megapixel matrix. But this is true for photos taken in good light. In the dark, the "apple" device photographs better. As for additional modules, in this regard, the South Korean looks more interesting, because it provides a 10x optical zoom. In a word, it is extremely difficult to determine a specific winner. What can not be said about the comparison of front cameras - Samsung wins it without any "buts".
When creating the Galaxy S21 Ultra, the manufacturer relied on the latest Bluetooth standard, while Apple settled on its usual fifth version. Not to mention that the Cupertino company once again refused to pay royalties for aptX HD. The rest of the set wireless modules devices are almost identical.
If we evaluate display, then in both cases it was created from organic light emitting diodes. The resolution is different, but the difference is already imperceptible to the human eye. The refresh rate in both cases is increased to 120 Hz.But in Samsung, the screen is implemented using more modern technology, so it is preferred to it. At least because of the presence of the Always On function, which the "apple" device still does not have.
CPU both phones do their job perfectly. It is unlikely that anyone will complain about the volume random access memory. Questions cause only 128 GB built-in storage. However, no one bothers to spend a larger amount to make this volume more impressive. There is no other solution to the problem, since there is no microSD slot in both cases. This is due to the fact that a removable drive would be slower than the built-in UFS 3.1 memory.
Top smartphones are absolutely not afraid of diving under water. Concerning battery, then this is a rare case when Apple decided to increase its capacity. This backfired with the fact that the smartphone began to weigh an inadequate 240 g. However, the competitor is a little lighter.
Index | Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra | iPhone 13 Pro Max |
Specifications | ||
Display | AMOLED, 6.8 inches, 3200x1440 pixels | OLED, 6.7 inches, 2778x1284 pixels |
CPU | Exynos 2100 | Apple A15 |
Memory (RAM + ROM) | 12 GB + 128 GB | 6 GB + 128 GB |
rear camera | 4 modules, 108 MP + 12 MP + 10 MP + 10 MP | 4 modules, 12 MP + 12 MP + 12 MP + AR scanner |
Price | RUB 106,900 | RUB 109,990 |
Moisture protection | IP68 | IP68 |
Criteria scores | ||
User opinion | 4.80 | 4.70 |
average price | 3.50 | 3.45 |
Ease of use | 4.80 | 4.60 |
cameras | 4.80 | 4.75 |
Display | 4.90 | 4.80 |
Sound | 4.75 | 4.75 |
autonomy | 4.80 | 4.75 |
Average score | 4.62 | 4.54 |
And even in the comparison of the latest flagships, Samsung wins. This machine provides the user with more options. Yes, not everyone will use reverse charging.Support for aptX HD is also useful only to a few owners of expensive headphones. Units also use USB Type-C to the maximum. But still, it's always nice when you realize that your smartphone can do a little more than you expect from it. With the iPhone 13 Pro Max, this feeling does not arise.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Best Camera
6. Comparison results
We determine the winner.Usually in such articles there is a serious struggle. But not in this case. Alas, Samsung puts its competitor on the shoulder blades. Whatever iPhone you take, you will always understand that for the same money you could get much more. Galaxy series smartphones have a better camera, a larger battery and a more modern display.
It must be admitted that in some cases, buying an iPhone makes sense. Such a device will often have a more stylish design. Practice also shows that Apple devices are slightly better protected from damage when dropped. But is it worth it? You will run into a number of restrictions. In particular, it is highly likely that you will soon experience a lack of permanent memory. Again, a competitor always offers more capacity, as they manufacture their own flash memory.
Characteristic | Samsung | iPhone |
Display | 4.76 | 4.53 |
Memory | 4.72 | 4.42 |
CPU | 4.67 | 4.75 |
Interfaces | 4.84 | 4.78 |
cameras | 4.63 | 4.50 |
Security | 4.70 | 4.68 |
Battery | 4.69 | 4.46 |
Outcome | 4.71 | 4.58 |